The Science of Living vs. the Science of Dying

Vital Aging is described as a new health science because there is a need for something that is uplifting.  Epigenetics is showing  the cell changes according to the mental attention it is given.  Most health care is always looking for the evil-disease.  It is bad, it must be stopped.  This is where drugs come in.  Alhough, we  are seeing drugs for the healthy.  The idea is to give drugs to people earlier so profits can increase.  There is still the expectation that the body will fail. 

Vital aging has the full assumption that the body will thrive when the enviroment is suitable.  If the environment is not suitable, we will change it, on the inside and the outside.

Is the science of dying “alive and well?”  Look back at all the controversial doctors and scientists who were attacked, poisoned, careers ruined, research stolen and burned.  This is an embarrassment to human kind.   Not to get off track, but the lack of information keeps us confined with limited choices.  We must still engage in diverse ideas, especially if they are more natural and based on nurturing rather than intervening. 

Vital aging is a choice that is not controversial, based on science, and affordable.  But it must first start with a decision to put things in perspective.  We must choose activities that help us live rather than help us die.  That means every choice we make from the time we get up in the morning until we go to bed makes a real impact in our lives. 

http://DrHomic.com